Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:38:49.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Erik Angner
Erik Angner
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science and Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15260. E-mail: ejast4@pitt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In promoting spontaneous orders—orders that evolve in a process of cultural evolution—as “efficient,” “beneficial,” and “advantageous,” Friedrich A. Hayek (1899–1992) has often been attributed the belief that there is something desirable about them. For this reason, he has been accused of committing the naturalistic fallacy, that is, of trying to derive an “ought” from an “is.” It appears that Hayek was quite aware of the charge, and vigorously disputed it: “I have no intention to commit what is often called the genetic or naturalistic fallacy” (1988, p. 27).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 349 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angner, E. 2002a. “The History of Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (4): 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angner, E. 2002b. “Book Review: Friedrich Hayek: A Biography, by Alan Ebenstein.” Economics and Philosophy 18 (2): 381–85.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. 1999. The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol. I. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. 2000. “The Emergence of Hayek's Ideas on Cultural Evolution.” Review of Austrian Economics 13 (1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. 2002. “Hayek and Cultural Evolution.” In Mäki, Uskali, ed., Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M. 1922. The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denis, A. 2002. “Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman.” Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3): 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gissurarson, H. H. 1987. Hayek's Conservative Liberalism. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1989. Liberalisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. I. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. III. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1984. “The Origin and Effect of Our Morals: A Problem for Science.” In Nishiyama, Chiaki and Leube, Kurt R., eds., The Essence of Hayek. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit, edited by Bartley, W. W. III. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature. In Morgan, Michael L., ed., Classics of Moral and Political Theory, 2nd edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Macbeath, A. 1952. Experiments in Living. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Petsoulas, C. 2001. Hayek's Liberalism and its Origins: His Idea of Spontaneous Order and the Scottish Enlightenment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. H. 1995. Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking, 3rd edition. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 1993. “Normative Judgments and Spontaneous Order: The Contractarian Element in Hayek's Thought.” Constitutional Political Economy 4 (3): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vlieghere, M. 1994. “A Reappraisal of Friedrich A. Hayek's Cultural Evolutionism.” Economics and Philosophy 10 (2): 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, D. G. 1998. “Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems.” Constitutional Political Economy 9 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar